Xtr toolbox

XTR ToolboxPortable tool to tweak, clean and optimize Windows.🚀 Extremely fast. 🚀 Supported platforms:Windows 10, Windows 11 - x64 only (Use v2.1 for x32).Net Framework: 4.8 (Included with Windows 10 1903+)(Note: Windows 7 && Windows 8 support is deprecated)Features Overview:Main Tools:Batch Startup ManagerCreate startup entriesLog startup changesExport startup list [Clipboard]Displays invalid entriesBatch Services ManagerLog service changesExport services list [Clipboard]Batch Software ManagerLog software changesExport software list [Clipboard]Force remove softwareSilently remove software (MSI)Hosts File Editor / ManagerQuick ToolsRebuild Icon CacheRebuild Font CacheReset Event LogsPrivacy Tools:Remove / Reinstall Windows AppsDetects currently present appsCleanup Tools:Junk Files Cleaner:Filter by dateFilter by custom extensionsCleaning support:User and Windows Temporary DirectoriesWindows Installer CacheWindows Update CacheWindows Logs DirectoryPrefetch CacheCrash Dump DirectoryGoogle Chrome CacheSteam Redistributable PackagesChrome Extensions ManagerOther:Automatic Dark / Light mode (Also configurable)What sets this toolbox apart from many others?Unlike other apps, this toolbox aims to:Be fast and lightweight regardless of feature setUse modern technologiesHave no ads, unnecessary things, or bloatSupport latest version of WindowsBe easy to use and have a good looking interfaceProject Goals - PlansTo add a lot more features (see backlog)Translate to other languagesHelp wikiYou can request a feature, open for all kinds of suggestionsGet feature parity with other toolbox suitesSupport me if you enjoy my software or spread the wordBecome a GitHub sponsorEvery bit helps and will enable me to focus more time on development.BacklogSoftware manager:Software update checker & downloaderAutomatically download and install software (with configuration per setup)Batch software installerMore control over force uninstallingDetection of different installers and uninstallers (Inno, NSIS, Msi,...)Services manager:Preset services changer (Batch services changes based on definition file)Services progress bar when changingBetter error handlingAdd color coding for easier management of their change severity and recommendationAdd memory usage for running servicesAutoruns manager:Check startup entries against known definition file for their validity (hosted on github)More options when creating a new startup entryJunk Files Cleaner:Improve scanning process (offer to cancel, improve scan progress)General:Add a post scan / clean / tweak option (like restarting / shutting down PC)Add a CLI interface for all toolsAdd a logger so the user can report bugs / features easilyAdd option to disable / tweak Windows bloat (all range of

Most bicycle chainrings have holes spaced around a bolt circle to attach them to the crank,.Aftermarket and less prominent brands tend to use the same bolt-circle patterns as the major brands. Since approximately 2010, there has been a rash of new bolt-hole patterns with uneven spacings. This crib sheet is accurate about incompatibility, but does not necessarily guarantee compatibility, which may depend on more than the bolt-hole pattern. Details about other factors affecting compatibility are on a separate page. Identification using templates With our PDF templates -- example at right -- you can directly check the BCD for all chainrings in commercial production, old and new, of which we know. You identify the bolt pattern by laying a chainring down on a template printout and rotating the chainring until the bolt holes align. The templates also let you quickly determine a chainring's tooth count. The tables at the bottom of this page give dimensions for major brands. Come back to this page to find out which common brands and models use the bolt pattern that you have identified. Measurement using a ruler You may use the tables on this page to measure bolt circles using a ruler. Instructions have been moved to a separate page. Tables of bolt-circle diameters 4-bolt, even spacing 4-bolt, uneven spacing 5-bolt 6- and 3-bolt 4-Bolt Cranks/Chainwheels, even spacing: For uneven spacings, see the next section of this table. Beware of near-matches! Measure! The BCD is 1.414, 1/sin 45°, times the spacing between adjacent holes.BCD (mm)SmallestRingBetween adjacent holes(mm)Application14644103.2Shimano XTR M960 Hollowtech 4-arm outer. 120 36 84.9 SRAM 2 x 10 and XX. Threaded.1123479.2Shimano XTR M950, M952 4-arm middle/outer 110 34 77.8 FSA K-Force Light, Vero Pro1043073.5Shimano XT, LX 4-arm outer 12 SPD, Sugino MX350. Some are threaded. See RaceFace compatibility table.1023272.1Shimano 2003 XTR MX960 4-arm middle, 96 30 67.9 Shimano compact triple cranksets models M782, M672, M622, M612 94 30 66.5 SRAM XO1, X1, GX, NX 90 30 63.6 FSA: K-Force Modular Supercompact, Omega Pro, Powerbox Supercompact Stealth, Road Modular, Vero Pro 88 28 62.2 Shimano M985 68 22 48.1 Shimano XTR M950, M952 4-arm inner,

Ride FeelBased on frame geometry and build specs.GearingA bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.Spec LevelBased on build material and quality level of the frame, fork, wheelset, groupset, suspension system, and more.Sizing185cm, size LG, Just rightView detailsTrek E-Caliber 9.9 XTR: first ride on £10,750 XC e-racebike - MBRApr 2021 · James BraceyThe new Trek E-Caliber 9.9 XTR electric XC mountain bike has got the looks, spec and price to turn heads and could be a glimpse into the e-bike future.Almost zero negative transition when pushing the E-Caliber past the motor cut-off.The combined low weight and non-invasive nature of the Fazua motor system creates a marvellously natural feeling e-bike.Front and rear end offer different performance characteristics.Range is disappointing.You could buy a Supercaliber or a Slash, and a Rail e-bike for less than the cost of the E-Caliber 9.9 XTR.Read ReviewFirst Ride: Trek E-CaliberFeb 2021 · Ryan PalmerThe Trek E-Caliber is based off the Supercaliber, Trek’s lightest, fastest, World Cup Cross Country race machine.Read ReviewTrek E-Caliber 9.9 XTR ReviewFeb 2021Price: $11499.99.00 | Model Year: 2021 | One of the lightest and fastest full suspension cross country ebikes available today, weighing just 36.6lbs with pedals. Carbon frame, crank arms, seat post, handlebar, and rims, the bike comes in four sizes. Designed around Boost hub spacing with 15mm and 12mm thru-axles for improved stiffness and support for wider tires. The battery and motor are built into a removable drivepack that can be swapped for an empty storage box so you can ride as a lightweight acoustic bike at just 30.1lbs.One of the lightest and fastest full suspension cross country ebikes available today, weighing just 36.6lbs with pedals. Carbon frame, crank arms, seat post, handlebar, and rims, the bike comes in four sizes. Designed around Boost hub spacing with 15mm and 12mm thru-axles for improved stiffness and support for wider tires. The battery and motor are built into a removable drivepack that can be swapped for an empty storage box so you can ride as a lightweight acoustic bike at just 30.1lbs.High quality Fox Factor air shocks front and rear. Unique single pivot strut design in the rear eliminates chain length changes and kickback while keeping weight as low as possible. Both shocks deliver remote lockout through a single lever near the left grip, which allows for efficient transitions from smooth to rough terrain. The bike ships with an additional lever that mounts at the dropper module for an optional seat post dropper.Quiet Fazua motor is lighter than most competing products but still provides good torque for steeper climbs, up to 55 newton meters. Exceptional 12-speed Shimano XTR drivetrain with enormous 10-51 tooth cassette and narrow-wide chainring to reduce drops on bumpy terrain. The XTR shifters perform very well and the rear hub has additional pawls for near instant pickup when you begin pedaling.Limited 252 watt hour battery capacity compared to other current-generation products, and the battery must

The statistical properties of Diffie–Hellman distributions.” Israel J. Math., 120, 23–46.MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar Canetti, R., J.B. Friedlander, and I.E. Shparlinski (1999). “On certain exponential sums and the distribution of Diffie–Hellman triples.” J. London Math. Soc., 59, 799–812.MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar Cherepnev, M.A. (1996). “On the connection between the discrete logarithms and the Diffie–Hellman problem.” Diskretnaja Matem., 6, 341–349 (in Russian).MathSciNet Google Scholar Coppersmith, D. and I.E. Shparlinski (2000). “On polynomial approximation of the discrete logarithm and the Diffie–Hellman mapping.” J. Cryptology, 13, 339–360.MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar Diffie, W. and M.E. Hellman (1976). “New directions in cryptography.” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 22, 109–112.MathSciNet Google Scholar El Mahassni, E. and I.E. Shparlinski (2001). “Polynomial representations of the Diffie–Hellman mapping.” Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., 63, 467–473.MATH Google Scholar Enge, A. (1999). Elliptic Curves and their Applications to Cryptography. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Google Scholar Friedlander, J.B. and I.E. Shparlinski (2001). “On the distribution of Diffie–Hellman triples with sparse exponents.” SIAM J. Discr. Math., 14, 162–169.MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar Galbraith, S.D. (2001). “Supersingular curves in cryptography.” Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2248, ed. C. Boyd. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 495–513. Google Scholar Gaudry, P., F. Hess, and N.P. Smart (2002). “Constructive and destructive facets of Weil descent on elliptic curves.” J. Cryptology, 15, 19–46.MathSciNet Google Scholar González Vasco, M.I. and I.E. Shparlinski (2001). “On the security of Diffie–Hellman bits.” Proc. Workshop on Cryptography and Computational Number Theory, Singapore, 1999. Birkhäuser, 257–268. Google Scholar Joux, A. (2000). “A one round protocol for tripartite Diffie–Hellman.” Proc. of ANTS-IV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1838, ed. W. Bosma. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 385–393. Google Scholar Joux, A. (2002). “The Weil and Tate pairings as building blocks for public key cryptosystems.” Proc. of ANTS V, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2369, eds. D. Kohel and C. Fieker. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 20–32. Google Scholar Koblitz, N. (1987). “Elliptic curve cryptosystems.” Math. Comp., 48, 203–209.MATH MathSciNet Google Scholar Koblitz, N. “Good and bad uses of elliptic curves in cryptography.” Moscow Math. Journal. To appear. Google Scholar Lenstra, A.K. and E.R. Verheul (2000). “The XTR public key system.” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1880, ed. M. Bellare. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1–19. Google Scholar Lenstra, A.K. and E.R. Verheul (2000). “Key improvements to XTR.” Advances in Cryptography—ASIACRYPT 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1976, ed. T. Okamoto. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 220–233. Google Scholar Lenstra, A.K. and E.R. Verheul (2001). “Fast irreducibility and subgroup membership testing in XTR.” PKC 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1992, ed. K. Kim. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 73–86. Google Scholar Lenstra, A.K. and E.R. Verheul (2001). “An overview of the XTR public key system.” Proc. the Conf. on Public Key Cryptography

FSA Comet Modular642245.3Shimano XTR M960, XT, LX 4-arm inner. See RaceFace compatibility table. 58 20 41.0 Sugino MX350 4-arm inner 4-Bolt Cranks/Chainwheels, uneven spacing: Measurements between adjacent holes of uneven patterns are adjusted to nearest whole degree of angle between bolt holes, reflecting probable correct values. The first number given is for holes nearest the crank. If there are three spacings, the last and smallest is for holes opposite the crank. BCD (mm)SmallestRingBetween adjacent holes(mm)Application 145 44 111.1, 93.2 Campagnolo Super Record, Record, Chorus 2015- outer 123 38 93.9, 79.1 Campagnolo Chorus, Ekar. Some also have holes at 96mm for inner chainring. 112 34 85.8, 72.0 Campagnolo Super Record, Record, Chorus 2015- inner 110 34 90.1, 63.1 Shimano Dura Ace 9000, Ultegra 6800, 105 5800, GRX outer, Tiagra 4703, 4700; Dura Ace with modification1103489.0, 64.7SRAM Apex 1. 72/108 degree angles. Shimano is 70, 110 degrees. 110 34 84.3, 77.8, 70.7 FSA Gossamer ABS, K-Force ABS, Powerbox, SL-K ABS 107 34 (?) 86.6, 62.9 SRAM X-Sync 100 32 92.7, 64.3, 58.8 3T Torno. Must use 3T bolts. Looks like a 5-bolt pattern with one bolt missing. 96 30 78.6, 55.1 Shimano XT M8000, SLX M7000, Deore M6000, 10mm holes; XTR M9000 and M9020, M7 threaded holes. 96 36 73.5, 67.9, 61.7 FSA 96/68 SLK MTB ABS 96 32 73.5, 61.7 Campagnolo Chorus 80 30 65.5, 45.9 Shimano GRX inner 76 26 65.8, 48.9 FSA Afterburner, Comet, K-Korce, SLK MTB ABS 76 25 62.3, 53.7, 48.9 SRAM XX1 11-speed, Cannondale, Specialized Stout. Threaded for M8 bolts. 68 22 52.1, 48.1, 43.7 FSA Comet MTB Modular, Comet triple, K-Force Modular, SL-K MTB Modular, V-Drive MTB Modular 64 22 52.4, 36.7 Shimano XT, SLX, XTR 11-speed with the "X" shaped bolt pattern. 5-Bolt Cranks/Chainwheels: The BCD when holes are evenly spaced is: 1.701, 1/sin 36°, times the spacing between adjacent holes, 1.052 , 1/sin 72°, times the spacing between non-adjacent holes. BCD (mm) Smallest Ring Between adjacent holes (mm) Between non-adjacent holes (mm) Application 151 44 88.8 143.6 Very old Campagnolo standard (pre '67) (Obsolete) 144 41 84.6 137.0 Old Campagnolo standard, still used