Shock wave firefox

RA (1977) Phase transitions under shock wave loading. Rev Mod Phys 43:523–579Article ADS Google Scholar Dlott DD (1995) Picosecond dynamics behind shock front. J Phys IV:C4, Suppl. III(5):C4-337-1-7 Google Scholar Noack J, Vogel A (1998) Single-shot spatially resolved characterization of laser-induced shock waves in water. Appl Opt 37:4092–4099Article ADS Google Scholar Nagayama K, Mori Y, Motegi Y, Nakahara M (2006) Shock Hugoniot for biological materials. Shock Waves 15:267–275Article ADS Google Scholar Nellis WJ, Moriarty JA, Mitchell AC, Ross M, Dandrea RG, Ashcroft NW, Holms NC, Gathers GR (1988) Metal physics at ultrahigh pressure: aluminum, copper, and lead as prototypes. Phys Rev Lett 60:1414–1417Article ADS Google Scholar Eliezer S, Ghatak A, Hora H (1986) An introduction to equation of state: theory and applications. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar Nagayama K (1994) New method of calculating shock temperature and entropy of solids based on the Hugoniot data. J Phys Soc Jpn 63:3737–3743Article ADS Google Scholar Chhabildas LC, Asay JR (1978) Rise-time measurements of shock transitions in aluminum, copper, and steel. J Appl Phys 50:2749–2754Article ADS Google Scholar Swegle JW, Grady DE (1985) Shock viscosity and the prediction of shock wave rise times. J Appl Phys 58:692–701Article ADS Google Scholar Rodean HC (1968) Relationship for condensed materials among heat of sublimation, shock-wave velocity, and particle velocity. J Chem Phys 49:4117–4127Article ADS Google Scholar Grüneisen E (1926) In: Greiger H, Scheel K (eds) Handbuch der Physik, 477, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–59 Google Scholar Steinberg D (1981) The temperature independence of Grüneisen gamma

Courtesy of ACLS-Algotithms.com (Click image to view site)Editor’s Note:It’s funny how you can go an entire career doing something (CPB) and hear the same thing every day, but actually not evaluate what it means. Yes, I have taken ACLS and studied the electrophysiology of the heart.So anyway, we have just taken off the X-Clamp, and the patient is relatively warm, and we decide to cardiovert due to fibrillation. Pretty standard procedure- we see it more often than not. At this point the cv surgeon tells the nurse to go with an asynchronous as opposed to synchronous shock mode. I had a brief moment of clarity… for the first time in 3000+ hearts, I actually think to myself, disassemble the two words “synchronous” and “asynchronous” and realize I really didn’t understand the difference, or what physiologic conditions dictated which mode to use.I feel foolish in revealing this personal information gap or cluelessness, but I figure there might be a few others out there that may not truly understand this difference. So bear with me (those perfusion savants out there) and I’ll just go ahead and put down some Cardioversion 101 info here 🙂 Synchronized cardioversion is a LOW ENERGY SHOCK that uses a sensor to deliver electricity that is synchronized with the peak of the QRS complex (the highest point of the R-wave). When the “sync” option is engaged on a defibrillator and the shock button pushed, there will be a delay in the shock. During this delay, the machine reads and synchronizes with the patients ECG rhythm. This occurs so that the shock can be delivered with or just after the peak of the R-wave in the patients QRS complex.Synchronization avoids the delivery of a LOW ENERGY shock during cardiac repolarization (t-wave). If the shock occurs on the t-wave (during repolarization), there is a high likelihood that the shock can precipitate VF (Ventricular Fibrillation).The most common indications for synchronized cardioversion are unstable atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, and supraventricular tachycardias. If medications fail in the stable patient with the before mentioned arrhythmias, synchronized cardioversion will most likely be indicated.=Unsynchronized cardioversion (defibrillation) is a HIGH ENERGY shock which is delivered as soon as the shock button is pushed on a defibrillator. This means that the shock may fall randomly anywhere within the cardiac cycle (QRS complex). Unsynchronized cardioversion (defibrillation) is used when there is no coordinated intrinsic electrical activity in

Zel’dovich YaB, Raizer YuP (1967) Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena (English translation), vol 2. Academic Press, New York and London, pp 685–784 Google Scholar Davidson L, Shahinpoor M (eds) (1997) High-pressure shock compression of solids I–IV. Springer, New York Google Scholar Bethe H (1942) Theory of shock waves in a medium with arbitrary equation of state. Original paper in report. Republished in: Johnson JN, Cheret R (eds) Classic papers on shock compression science. Springer, London, 1998, pp 421–492 Google Scholar McQueen RG, Marsh SP, Taylor JW, Fritz JN, Carter WJ (1970) High velocity impact phenomena. In: Kinslow R (ed), Chap VII. Academic Press, New York, pp 293–417 Google Scholar Marsh SP (1981) Los Alamos shock Hugoniot data. University of California, Berkeley Google Scholar van Thiel M (1966) Compendium of shock wave data. University of California Press, Livermore, CA Google Scholar Entrance page to shock wave database (2002)Decarli PS, Jamieson JC (1961) Formation of diamond by explosive shock. Science 133:1821–1822Article ADS Google Scholar Prümmer R (2006) Explosive compaction of powders and composites. CRC Press, BerlinBook Google Scholar Cowan GR, Holtzman AH (1963) Flow configuration in colliding plates: explosive bonding. J Appl Phys 34:928–939Article ADS Google Scholar Christiansen EL (1995) Hypervelocity impact testing above 10 km/s of advanced orbital debris shields. In: Proceedings of APS conference on shock compression of condensed matter, pp 1183–1186 Google Scholar Mashimo T (1993) Shock waves in materials science. In: Sawaoka A (ed), Chap 6. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 113–144 Google Scholar Duvall GE, Graham