Openssl 1 1 1f 64 bit
Author: m | 2025-04-24
OpenSSL 64-bit 576. Closed FeodorFitsner opened this issue 1 comment Closed OpenSSL 64-bit 576. FeodorFitsner opened this issue 1
1F Pro Upgrade Electric Screwdriver Portable 64 in 1 Bits Screw Driver
Facebook does not make a secret that it uses ‘community developments’ that may include OpenSSL.Use the Zignatures engine embedded in Radare2. First, compile all the necessary libraries (i.e. BoringSSL and OpenSSL) to make their architecture consistent with the tested one. Then check whether your files can be compared with the tested binary file using the signature analysis.## here, the signatures will be scanned$ file libliger.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, stripped## from here, the first portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, with debug_info, not stripped## from here, the second portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, with debug_info, not stripped## from here, the third portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/openssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, not stripped## from here, the fourth portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/openssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, not strippedUsing Zignatures, generate signatures for each .so file and save them for further analysis:$ r2 bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.so$ [0x0009e210]> aa$ [0x0006e210]> zg$ [0x0009e210]> zos sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.zThen launch the search procedure for signatures inside libliger:$ r2 libliger.so$ [0x0006e170]> aa$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/openssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/openssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.z$ [0x0006e170]> z/ # launching the scan[+] searching 0x003e3c38 - 0x00430c1c[+] searching 0x003b2430 - 0x003e3c38[+] searching 0x00000000 - 0x00395744[+] searching metricshits: 2685And after some time, you can review the search results:$ [0x0006e170]> zi~EVP_Encrypt # searching for EVP_Encrypt*0x001f20ac 56 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_770x001f20ac 56 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_830x000ba080 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_10300x000ba080 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_10360x000ba130 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_10990x000ba130 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_11050x000d5aa4 516 sign.bytes.sym.EVP_EncryptUpdate_00x000a6958 64 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_17830x000a6958 64 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_1789$ [0x0006e170]> zi~verify_cert_chain # searching for *ssl_verify_cert_chain$ [0x0006e170]> zi~gcm128 # looking up functions by interaction with AES GCM0x000de3c4 240 sign.refs.sym.CRYPTO_gcm128_tag_90x001c1904 224 OpenSSL 64-bit 576. Closed FeodorFitsner opened this issue 1 comment Closed OpenSSL 64-bit 576. FeodorFitsner opened this issue 1 Describe the bugWhen running nmap with the -sT parameter, the scan never completes. Keeps just saying 0.00% done. Have let it run for more than an hour.To ReproduceRun nmap with -sT parameter. Runs fine when the parameter is removedExpected behaviorI expect it to run within a few seconds. The same command worked perfectly in 7.93.Version info (please complete the following information):OS: Windows server 2012Output of nmap --version:Nmap version 7.94 ( )Platform: i686-pc-windows-windowsCompiled with: nmap-liblua-5.4.4 openssl-3.0.8 nmap-libssh2-1.10.0 nmap-libz-1.2.13 nmap-libpcre-7.6 Npcap-1.75 nmap-libdnet-1.12 ipv6Compiled without:Available nsock engines: iocp poll selectOutput of nmap --iflistStarting Nmap 7.94 ( ) at 2023-06-23 16:31 Central Daylight TimeINTERFACESDEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MTU MACeth0 (eth0) fe80::5b7f:b21:7155:7e30/64 ethernet down 1500 3C:EC:EF:B2:54:42eth1 (eth1) fe80::7561:3224:ade4:5230/64 ethernet up 1500 AC:1F:6B:87:66:D3eth1 (eth1) 10.2.1.52/24 ethernet up 1500 AC:1F:6B:87:66:D3lo0 (lo0) ::1/128 loopback up -1lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/8 loopback up -1DEV WINDEVICEeth0 \Device\NPF_{6BCFDEC4-A31F-4CE4-82B1-56C4B1C2F3D5}eth1 \Device\NPF_{E645965B-E8A9-46EF-BE19-82BAB3D8EBC7}eth1 \Device\NPF_{E645965B-E8A9-46EF-BE19-82BAB3D8EBC7}lo0 \Device\NPF_Loopbacklo0 \Device\NPF_Loopback \Device\NPF_{984DE894-CEB8-4667-A0A9-02CD6637677A} \Device\NPF_{9E8736B7-6794-496A-98B2-1F20B959622A} \Device\NPF_{09D6E3C2-A2FB-44A4-A46B-F3F614AF90BE}ROUTESDST/MASK DEV METRIC GATEWAY255.255.255.255/32 eth1 261255.255.255.255/32 eth1 28110.2.1.52/32 eth1 28110.2.1.255/32 eth1 281127.255.255.255/32 lo0 331127.0.0.1/32 lo0 331255.255.255.255/32 lo0 33110.2.1.0/24 eth1 281127.0.0.0/8 lo0 331224.0.0.0/4 eth1 261224.0.0.0/4 eth1 281224.0.0.0/4 lo0 3310.0.0.0/0 eth1 281 10.2.1.31fe80::5b7f:b21:7155:7e30/128 eth0 261fe80::7561:3224:ade4:5230/128 eth1 281::1/128 lo0 331fe80::/64 eth0 261fe80::/64 eth1 281ff00::/8 eth0 261ff00::/8 eth1 281ff00::/8 lo0 331Additional contextNoneComments
Facebook does not make a secret that it uses ‘community developments’ that may include OpenSSL.Use the Zignatures engine embedded in Radare2. First, compile all the necessary libraries (i.e. BoringSSL and OpenSSL) to make their architecture consistent with the tested one. Then check whether your files can be compared with the tested binary file using the signature analysis.## here, the signatures will be scanned$ file libliger.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, stripped## from here, the first portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, with debug_info, not stripped## from here, the second portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, with debug_info, not stripped## from here, the third portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/openssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, not stripped## from here, the fourth portion of signatures will be taken $ file bin/openssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.soELF 64-bit LSB pie executable ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV),dynamically linked, not strippedUsing Zignatures, generate signatures for each .so file and save them for further analysis:$ r2 bin/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.so$ [0x0009e210]> aa$ [0x0006e210]> zg$ [0x0009e210]> zos sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.zThen launch the search procedure for signatures inside libliger:$ r2 libliger.so$ [0x0006e170]> aa$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/boringssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/openssl/arm64-v8a/libssl.z$ [0x0006e170]> zo sig/openssl/arm64-v8a/libcrypto.z$ [0x0006e170]> z/ # launching the scan[+] searching 0x003e3c38 - 0x00430c1c[+] searching 0x003b2430 - 0x003e3c38[+] searching 0x00000000 - 0x00395744[+] searching metricshits: 2685And after some time, you can review the search results:$ [0x0006e170]> zi~EVP_Encrypt # searching for EVP_Encrypt*0x001f20ac 56 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_770x001f20ac 56 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_830x000ba080 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_10300x000ba080 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_10360x000ba130 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_10990x000ba130 72 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_11050x000d5aa4 516 sign.bytes.sym.EVP_EncryptUpdate_00x000a6958 64 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptInit_17830x000a6958 64 sign.refs.sym.EVP_EncryptFinal_ex_1789$ [0x0006e170]> zi~verify_cert_chain # searching for *ssl_verify_cert_chain$ [0x0006e170]> zi~gcm128 # looking up functions by interaction with AES GCM0x000de3c4 240 sign.refs.sym.CRYPTO_gcm128_tag_90x001c1904 224
2025-04-15Describe the bugWhen running nmap with the -sT parameter, the scan never completes. Keeps just saying 0.00% done. Have let it run for more than an hour.To ReproduceRun nmap with -sT parameter. Runs fine when the parameter is removedExpected behaviorI expect it to run within a few seconds. The same command worked perfectly in 7.93.Version info (please complete the following information):OS: Windows server 2012Output of nmap --version:Nmap version 7.94 ( )Platform: i686-pc-windows-windowsCompiled with: nmap-liblua-5.4.4 openssl-3.0.8 nmap-libssh2-1.10.0 nmap-libz-1.2.13 nmap-libpcre-7.6 Npcap-1.75 nmap-libdnet-1.12 ipv6Compiled without:Available nsock engines: iocp poll selectOutput of nmap --iflistStarting Nmap 7.94 ( ) at 2023-06-23 16:31 Central Daylight TimeINTERFACESDEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MTU MACeth0 (eth0) fe80::5b7f:b21:7155:7e30/64 ethernet down 1500 3C:EC:EF:B2:54:42eth1 (eth1) fe80::7561:3224:ade4:5230/64 ethernet up 1500 AC:1F:6B:87:66:D3eth1 (eth1) 10.2.1.52/24 ethernet up 1500 AC:1F:6B:87:66:D3lo0 (lo0) ::1/128 loopback up -1lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/8 loopback up -1DEV WINDEVICEeth0 \Device\NPF_{6BCFDEC4-A31F-4CE4-82B1-56C4B1C2F3D5}eth1 \Device\NPF_{E645965B-E8A9-46EF-BE19-82BAB3D8EBC7}eth1 \Device\NPF_{E645965B-E8A9-46EF-BE19-82BAB3D8EBC7}lo0 \Device\NPF_Loopbacklo0 \Device\NPF_Loopback \Device\NPF_{984DE894-CEB8-4667-A0A9-02CD6637677A} \Device\NPF_{9E8736B7-6794-496A-98B2-1F20B959622A} \Device\NPF_{09D6E3C2-A2FB-44A4-A46B-F3F614AF90BE}ROUTESDST/MASK DEV METRIC GATEWAY255.255.255.255/32 eth1 261255.255.255.255/32 eth1 28110.2.1.52/32 eth1 28110.2.1.255/32 eth1 281127.255.255.255/32 lo0 331127.0.0.1/32 lo0 331255.255.255.255/32 lo0 33110.2.1.0/24 eth1 281127.0.0.0/8 lo0 331224.0.0.0/4 eth1 261224.0.0.0/4 eth1 281224.0.0.0/4 lo0 3310.0.0.0/0 eth1 281 10.2.1.31fe80::5b7f:b21:7155:7e30/128 eth0 261fe80::7561:3224:ade4:5230/128 eth1 281::1/128 lo0 331fe80::/64 eth0 261fe80::/64 eth1 281ff00::/8 eth0 261ff00::/8 eth1 281ff00::/8 lo0 331Additional contextNone
2025-03-30Have our CSR, we will verify the content of the certificate.# openssl req -noout -text -in ban27.csrCertificate Request: Data: Version: 1 (0x0) Subject: C = IN, ST = Karnataka, L = Bengaluru, O = GoLinuxCloud, OU = R&D, CN = ban27.example.com Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption RSA Public-Key: (2048 bit) Modulus: 00:b9:de:b9:d5:6a:36:77:1e:72:76:28:09:5e:d5: 61:17:60:fc:ed:4d:b2:22:61:5d:24:16:88:6d:89: b5:ae:45:74:1f:39:f0:4f:bc:1c:07:f2:82:d6:4b: 10:29:05:15:e2:78:26:2c:82:e1:5e:c7:54:8f:94: eb:d0:79:80:43:d0:d8:9e:04:88:d6:d3:4c:c0:25: 61:f8:67:98:fb:17:cd:35:e5:d9:1f:d0:6f:83:2f: a2:82:9f:1d:aa:77:4f:7f:e8:50:ea:80:96:7d:31: a9:c3:16:6a:30:7e:8f:52:5a:8c:b6:62:97:d6:84: 17:19:f4:1c:95:39:94:c0:81:86:25:9b:85:50:65: c6:39 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) Attributes: a0:00 Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption 51:81:12:53:22:8e:92:3c:c0:7c:b6:dc:cc:ff:63:35:6a:24: 2d:3e:f2:1f:d0:df:bf:c8:73:02:ea:19:d5:ff:2d:b5:78:3d: b4:a7:43:3c:96:92:25:62:83:b1:9e:8c:81:33:92:0c:1f:83: 6e:50:bd:cd:69:2c:32:a9:9f:12:43:f8:de:6f:28:d1:4c:3d: 2e:b7:ac:f4:50:15:22:e2:5c:21:22:c9:e9:bc:e5:d2:f9:49: 10:c5:87:58:60:a1:da:64:aa:55:b6:06:2f:29:31:4e:b6:a7: b6:11:dd:31:ed:7c:32:dd:f3:2f:2f:0a:e3:37:b0:f4:b1:86:What's NextNow you can either submit this CSR to third party CA to get your certificates or if you want to sign these certificates using your own CA then:Create your own Certificate Authority and sign a certificate with Root CACreate SAN certificate to use the same certificate across multiple clientsConclusionIn this tutorial I shared the steps to generate interactive and non-interactive methods to generate CSR using openssl in Linux. Once these CSR are generated, you can share it to your third party CA. To test your server, or to run your server internally in your organization, you can act as your own Certificate Authority and self-sign your certificate.Lastly I hope the steps from the article to generate CSR on Linux was helpful. So, let me know your suggestions and feedback using the comment section. Can't find what you're searching for? Let us assist you. Enter your query below, and we'll provide instant results tailored to your needs.
2025-04-02Latest Version RubyInstaller 3.4.2-1 (64-bit) Operating System Windows XP64 / Vista64 / Windows 7 64 / Windows 8 64 / Windows 10 64 / Windows 11 User Rating Click to vote Author / Product RubyInstaller Team / External Link Filename rubyinstaller-3.2.1-1-x64.exe Sometimes latest versions of the software can cause issues when installed on older devices or devices running an older version of the operating system.Software makers usually fix these issues but it can take them some time. What you can do in the meantime is to download and install an older version of RubyInstaller 3.2.1-1 (64-bit). For those interested in downloading the most recent release of RubyInstaller or reading our review, simply click here. All old versions distributed on our website are completely virus-free and available for download at no cost. We would love to hear from youIf you have any questions or ideas that you want to share with us - head over to our Contact page and let us know. We value your feedback! What's new in this version: Changed:- Update to ruby-3.2.1, see release notes- Update the SSL CA certificate list and to OpenSSL-3.0.8- Move OpenSSL config directroy from /ssl/ to /etc/ssl/ to follow upstream change in msys2/MINGW-packages@2f97826- Allow home directory with white space when installing gems into users home- Don't overwrite GEM_HOME or BUNDLE_SYSTEM_BINDIR if already present- Don't set bindir to a non-existing directory
2025-04-24